4.6 Review

Building bio-assays with magnetic particles on a digital microfluidic platform

Journal

NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 485-503

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2015.03.007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KU Leuven Research Council (IDO-project) [10/012]
  2. KU Leuven Research Council (OT project) [13/058]
  3. KU Leuven Research Council (Atheromix IOF-knowledge platform)
  4. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders-FWO [G.0997.11, G.0861.14]
  5. European Commission [264737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital microfluidics (DMF) has emerged as a promising liquid handling technology for a variety of applications, demonstrating great potential both in terms of miniaturization and automation. DMF is based on the manipulation of discrete, independently controllable liquid droplets, which makes it highly reconfigurable and reprogrammable. One of its most exclusive advantages, compared to microchannel-based microfluidics, is its ability to precisely handle solid nano-and microsized objects, such as magnetic particles. Magnetic particles have become very popular in the last decade, since their high surface-to-volume ratio and the possibility to magnetically separate them from the matrix make them perfect suitable as a solid support for bio-assay development. The potential of magnetic particles in DMF-based bio-assays has been demonstrated for various applications. In this review we discuss the latest developments of magnetic particle-based DMF bio-assays with the aim to present, identify and analyze the trends in the field. We also discuss the state-of-the art of device integration, current status of commercialization and issues that still need to be addressed. With this paper we intend to stimulate researchers to exploit and unveil the potential of these exciting tools, which will shape the future of modern biochemistry, microbiology and biomedical diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available