4.3 Article

Relationship between brain interstitial fluid tumor necrosis factor-α and cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 853-856

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.11.041

Keywords

Cerebral microdialysis; Delayed cerebral ischemia; Multimodality monitoring; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Vasospasm

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI058211, R01 AI058211-05] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R21 ES016835-01, R21 ES016835] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has a crucial role in the onset of hemolysis-induced vascular injury and cerebral vasoconstriction We hypothesized that TNF-alpha measured from brain interstitial fluid would correlate with the severity of vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) From a consecutive series of 10 aSAH patients who underwent cerebral microdialysis (MD) and evaluation of vasospasm by CT angiogram (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). TNF-alpha levels from MD were measured at 8-hour intervals from aSAH days 4-6 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay An attending neuroradiologist blinded to the study independently evaluated each CTA and DSA and assigned a vasospasm index (VI). Five patients had a VI < 2 and 5 patients had a VI > 2, where the median VI was 2 (range 0-13) The median log TNF-alpha area under the curve (AUC) was 164 pg/mL * day (interquartile range 1.48-1.71) for the VI < 2 group, and 2.11 pg/mL * day (interquartile range 1.95-2.47) for the VI > 2 group (p < 0.01) Thus, in this small series of poor-grade aSAH patients, the AUC of TNF-alpha levels from aSAH days 4-6 correlates with the severity of radiographic vasospasm Further analysis in a larger population is warranted based on our preliminary findings (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available