4.3 Article

Neuroprotective effects of infliximab in experimental spinal cord ischemic injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1563-1567

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.027

Keywords

Antioxidants; Infliximab; Ischemia; Oxidative stress; Reperfusion injury; Spinal cord

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of spinal cord injury after both ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) and trauma. This experimental study was designed to investigate the potential effects of infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agent, on I/R injury of the rabbit spinal cord. Eighteen New Zealand white rabbits were divided into three groups, each consisting of six rabbits: sham (no I/R), I/R, and infliximab (I/R + infliximab). Spinal cord ischemia was induced by applying an infrarenal aortic cross clamp for 30 minutes. At 48 hours after ischemia, animals were functionally evaluated using the Tarlov score. Changes in the spinal cord were observed by measuring tissue levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and by evaluating hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. At 48 hours after ischemia, the Tarlov scores in the infliximab group were higher than those of the I/R group, MDA and AOPP levels in the I/R group were significantly higher than those in the sham and infliximab groups (p < 0.05), and SOD levels in the infliximab group were significantly higher than those in the I/R and sham groups (p < 0.05). The sham group had higher GSH levels than the infliximab group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Histological examination revealed that the infliximab group had significantly less vascular proliferation, edema, and neuron loss than the I/R group. These results indicate that influximab may protect the spinal cord against injury in a rabbit I/R model. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available