4.4 Article

Chronic Daily Headache in Korea: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, Medical Consultation and Management

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 236-243

Publisher

KOREAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2014.10.3.236

Keywords

chronic daily headache; chronic migraine; epidemiology; headache; migraine

Funding

  1. Boryung Pharmaceutical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Chronic daily headache (CDH) is a commonly reported reason for visiting hospital neurology departments, but its prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management have not been well documented in Korea. The objective of this study was to characterize the 1-year prevalence, clinical characteristics, medical consultations, and treatment for CDH in Korea. Methods The Korean Headache Survey (KHS) is a nationwide descriptive survey of 1507 Korean adults aged between 19 and 69 years. The KHS investigated headache Characteristics, Sociodemographics, and headache-related disability using a structured interview. We used the KHS data for this study. Results The 1-year prevalence of CDH was 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.5%), and 25.1% Of the Subjects with CDH met the criteria for medication Overuse. Two thirds (66.7%) of CDH subjects were classified as having chronic migraine, and approximately half of the CDH subjects (48.1%) reported that their headaches either substantially or severely affected their quality Of life. Less than half (40.7%) of the subjects with CDH reported having consulted a doctor for their headaches and 40.7% had not received treatment for their headaches during the previous year. Conclusions The prevalence of CDH was 1.8% and medication overuse was associated with one-quarter of CDH cases in Korea. Many subjects with CDH do not seek medical consultation and do not receive appropriate treatment for their headaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available