4.4 Article

Gender Differences in the Functional Recovery after Acute Stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 183-188

Publisher

KOREAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2010.6.4.183

Keywords

gender differences; stroke; disability; outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Interest in gender differences in the effects of acute stroke is growing worldwide However, gender differences in functional recovery after acute stroke in the Korean population have yet to be evaluated The aim of this investigation was to compare long term functional outcomes between male and female after acute stroke Methods Patients with acute stroke were enrolled prospectively between January 2005 and January 2009 Baseline characteristics risk factors stroke subtypes, time delay from onset to arrival at a hospital, active treatment and stroke severity were compared between male and female Differences in mortality and disability at discharge, and at 3 months and 1 year after stroke onset were also investigated Functional disabilities were categorized into two groups good outcome (score on modified Rankin scale <= 2) and poor outcome (score on modified Rankin scale >2) Results Among 1,055 patients with acute stroke, 575 were male (aged 64 83 +/- 11 98 years, mean +/- SD) and 480 were female (aged 70 09 +/- 13 02 years) There were no gender differences in mortality at 3 months and 1 year after stroke The frequency of poor outcomes was higher in female patients than in male patients at discharge (39 8% versus 30 9% respectively p=0 003), the 3 months follow-up (323% versus 208%, respectively, p<0 001), and the 1 year follow-up (31 1% versus 18 7% respectively p=0 001) After adjusting for multiple confounding factors including age and stroke seventy, the female gender persisted as a predictor of poor functional outcome at 3 months and 1 year after stroke Conclusions Female patients have greater difficulty than malt patients in recovering from a disabled state after acute stroke Future studies should investigate the causes of this gender difference J Clin Neurol 2010,6 183 188

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available