4.7 Article

Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrobial Resistance by Whole-Genome Sequencing

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 1182-1191

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03117-13

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  2. UKCRC Modernising Medical Microbiology Consortium
  3. UKCRC Translational Infection Research Initiative
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  6. National Institute for Health Research on behalf of the Department of Health [G0800778]
  7. Wellcome Trust [087646/Z/08/Z, 090532/Z/09/Z]
  8. Hospital Infection Society
  9. MRC [G0800778, MR/K023985/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MR/K023985/1, G0800778] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10047, ACF-2007-27-002, CL-2013-27-001, NF-SI-0508-10279, NF-SI-0513-10110] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could potentially provide a single platform for extracting all the information required to predict an organism's phenotype. However, its ability to provide accurate predictions has not yet been demonstrated in large independent studies of specific organisms. In this study, we aimed to develop a genotypic prediction method for antimicrobial susceptibilities. The whole genomes of 501 unrelated Staphylococcus aureus isolates were sequenced, and the assembled genomes were interrogated using BLASTn for a panel of known resistance determinants (chromosomal mutations and genes carried on plasmids). Results were compared with phenotypic susceptibility testing for 12 commonly used antimicrobial agents (penicillin, methicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, trimethoprim, gentamicin, fusidic acid, rifampin, and mupirocin) performed by the routine clinical laboratory. We investigated discrepancies by repeat susceptibility testing and manual inspection of the sequences and used this information to optimize the resistance determinant panel and BLASTn algorithm. We then tested performance of the optimized tool in an independent validation set of 491 unrelated isolates, with phenotypic results obtained in duplicate by automated broth dilution (BD Phoenix) and disc diffusion. In the validation set, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the genomic prediction method were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.95 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1), respectively, compared to standard susceptibility testing methods. The very major error rate was 0.5%, and the major error rate was 0.7%. WGS was as sensitive and specific as routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods. WGS is a promising alternative to culture methods for resistance prediction in S. aureus and ultimately other major bacterial pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available