4.7 Article

Sonication versus Vortexing of Implants for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 591-594

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02482-12

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofilm removal efficacy of vortexing alone was compared with the standard vortexing-sonication procedure. Among 135 removed prostheses, 35 were diagnosed with infection and 100 with aseptic failure. At a cutoff of >= 50 CFU/ml, sonication was more sensitive than vortexing (60% versus 40%, P = 0.151), while the specificity was 99% for both methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available