Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 725-727Publisher
AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01028-10
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We compared two commercial PCR assays, the Prodesse ProGastro CD assay and the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, with a laboratory-developed Clostridium difficile toxin PCR assay with previously established performance characteristics. Results of all methods were in agreement for 333 (96%) of 346 stool specimens. No significant difference in performance among the assays was found (P values, >0.05).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available