4.7 Article

Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci and Their SCCmec Types in a Long-Term-Care Facility

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 32-37

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01085-08

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Paulo Foundation and the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following an outbreak caused by staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type V methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a point-prevalence survey of the nasal carriage of staphylococci was conducted in a long-term-care facility in northern Finland in 2004. The focus was directed at methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CNS) and their SCCmec elements. A nasal swab was taken from 76 of the 80 residents 6 months after the onset of the outbreak. Staphylococcal isolates were identified by conventional methods and the GenoType Staphylococcus test, and their SCCmec elements were analyzed. Of the 76 individuals, 24 (32%) carried S. aureus and 67 (88%) CNS in their nostrils. Of the CNS carriers, 41 (61%) had at least one mecA-positive MR-CNS, and two individuals (3%) had both MRSA and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Among the 61 MR-CNS isolates identified, 49 (80%) were MRSE. The distribution of the SCCmec types was diverse: 20 (33%) were of type IV, 11 (18%) of type V, 4 (6%) of type I or IA, 3 (4%) of type II, and 23 (38%) of new types (with six different combinations of ccr and other mec genes or only mecA). Both of the individuals with MRSA and MRSE shared SCCmec type V among their isolates. Nasal MR-CNS carriage was common among the residents of this long-term-care facility. A variety of SCCmec types, including many new types, were identified among the MR-CNS strains. The horizontal transfer of SCCmec elements is speculated based on the sharing of SCCmec type V between MRSA and MRSE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available