4.8 Article

miR-200-containing extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell metastasis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 124, Issue 12, Pages 5109-5128

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI75695

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jane Coffin Childs Fund [61-1465]
  2. Fulbright Visiting Scholar grant [1213204]
  3. Portuguese Ministry of Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/37188/2007]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/37188/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metastasis is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Not all cancer cells within a tumor are capable of metastasizing. The microRNA-200 (miR-200) family, which regulates the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition, is enriched in the serum of patients with metastatic cancers. Ectopic expression of miR-200 can confer metastatic ability to poorly metastatic tumor cells in some settings. Here, we investigated whether metastatic capability could be transferred between metastatic and nonmetastatic cancer cells via extracellular vesicles. miR-200 was secreted in extracellular vesicles from metastatic murine and human breast cancer cell lines, and miR-200 levels were increased in sera of mice bearing metastatic tumors. In culture, murine and human metastatic breast cancer cell extracellular vesicles transferred miR-200 microRNAs to nonmetastatic cells, altering gene expression and promoting mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. In murine cancer and human xenograft models, miR-200 expressing tumors and extracellular vesicles from these tumors promoted metastasis of otherwise weakly metastatic cells either nearby or at distant sites and conferred to these cells the ability to colonize distant tissues in a miR-200 dependent manner. Together, our results demonstrate that metastatic capability can be transferred by the uptake of extracellular vesicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available