4.8 Article

Reciprocal regulation by TLR4 and TGF-β in tumor-initiating stem-like cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages 2832-2849

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI65859

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [1R01AA018857, 5RC2AA019392, P50AA11999, 5P30DK048522-13, R24AA012885, AI83025U19, CA123328, CA108302, R01 CA042857, P01 CA130821, P30 CA016672, P30 DK56338]
  2. Zumberge Foundation [U19AI83025]
  3. American Cancer Society [RSG MPC122545, IRG-58-007-48]
  4. German Research Foundation [SFB-TRR77]
  5. NIH/NCI [P30 CA 014089]
  6. NIH/NVRR [S10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs) are resistant to chemotherapy and associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by HCV and/or alcohol-related chronic liver injury. Using HCV Tg mouse models and patients with HCC, we isolated CD133(+) TICs and identified the pluripotency marker NANO G as a direct target of TLR4, which drives the tumor-initiating activity of TICs. These TLR4/NANOG-dependent TICs were defective in the TGF-beta tumor suppressor pathway. Functional oncogene screening of a TIC cDNA library identified Yap1 and Igf2bp3 as NANOG-dependent genes that inactivate TGF-beta signaling. Mechanistically, we determined that YAP1 mediates cytoplasmic retention of phosphorylated. SMAD3 and suppresses SMAD3 phosphorylation/activation by the IGF2BP3/AKT/mTOR pathway. Silencing of both YAP1 and IGF2BP3 restored TGF-beta signaling, inhibited pluripotency genes and tumorigenesis, and abrogated chemoresistance of TICs. Mice with defective TGF-beta signaling (Spnb2(+/-) mice) exhibited enhanced liver TLR4 expression and developed HCC in a TLR4-dependent manner. Taken together, these results suggest that the activated TLR4/NANOG oncogenic pathway is linked to suppression of cytostatic TGF-beta signaling and could potentially serve as a therapeutic target for HCV-related HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available