4.8 Article

Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages 3025-3036

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI68782

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Duke University Chair's Research Award
  2. Imaging Special Shared Facility of the Shriners Hospitals for Children, Portland, Oregon, USA
  3. [T32HL007538]
  4. [T32HL098099]
  5. [R37HL071303]
  6. [UO1HL111018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas exchange in the lung occurs within alveoli, air-filled sacs composed of type 2 and type 1 epithelial cells (AEC2s and AEC1s), capillaries, and various resident mesenchymal cells. Here, we use a combination of in vivo clonal lineage analysis, different injury/repair systems, and in vitro culture of purified cell populations to obtain new information about the contribution of AEC2s to alveolar maintenance and repair. Genetic lineage-tracing experiments showed that surfactant protein C-positive (SFTPC-positive) AEC2s self renew and differentiate over about a year, consistent with the population containing long-term alveolar stem cells. Moreover, if many AEC2s were specifically ablated, high-resolution imaging of intact lungs showed that individual survivors undergo rapid clonal expansion and daughter cell dispersal. Individual lineage-labeled AEC2s placed into 3D culture gave rise to self-renewing alveolospheres, which contained both AEC2s and cells expressing multiple AEC1 markers, including HOPX, a new marker for AEC1s. Growth and differentiation of the alveolospheres occurred most readily when cocultured with primary PDGFR alpha(+) lung stromal cells. This population included lipofibroblasts that normally reside close to AEC2s and may therefore contribute to a stem cell niche in the murine lung. Results suggest that a similar dynamic exists between AEC2s and mesenchymal cells in the human lung.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available