4.8 Article

A metabolic prosurvival role for PML in breast cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 122, Issue 9, Pages 3088-3100

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI62129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. NCI Harvard SPORE in breast cancer [2P50 CA089393]
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. EMBO
  5. Ramon y Cajal award (Spanish Ministry of Education)
  6. ISCIII [PI10/01484]
  7. Marie Curie IRG grant [277043]
  8. Basque Government of Education [PI2012-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer cells exhibit an aberrant metabolism that facilitates more efficient production of biomass and hence tumor growth and progression. However, the genetic cues modulating this metabolic switch remain largely undetermined. We identified a metabolic function for the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene, uncovering an unexpected role for this bona fide tumor suppressor in breast cancer cell survival. We found that PML acted. as both a negative regulator of PPAR gamma coactivator 1A (PGC1A) acetylation and a potent activator of PPAR signaling and fatty acid oxidation. We further showed that PML promoted ATP production and inhibited anoikis. Importantly, PML expression allowed luminal filling in 3D basement membrane breast culture models, an effect that was reverted by the pharmacological inhibition of fatty acid oxidation. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis of breast cancer biopsies revealed that PML was overexpressed in a subset of breast cancers and enriched in triple-negative cases. Indeed, PML expression in breast cancer correlated strikingly with reduced time to recurrence, a gene signature of poor prognosis, and activated PPAR signaling. These findings have important therapeutic implications, as PML and its key role in fatty acid oxidation metabolism are amenable to pharmacological suppression, a potential future mode of cancer prevention and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available