4.8 Article

Genetic variation in T-box binding element functionally affects SCN5A/SCN10A enhancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages 2519-2530

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI62613

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS grant) [2010B205]
  2. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme contract (CardioGeNet) [223463]
  3. Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS) [2005T024]
  4. Center for Medical Systems Biology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The contraction pattern of the heart relies on the activation and conduction of the electrical impulse. Perturbations of cardiac conduction have been associated with congenital and acquired arrhythmias as well as cardiac arrest. The pattern of conduction depends on the regulation of heterogeneous gene expression by key transcription factors and transcriptional enhancers. Here, we assessed the genome-wide occupation of conduction system-regulating transcription factors TBX3, NKX2-5, and GATA4 and of enhancer-associated coactivator p300 in the mouse heart, uncovering cardiac enhancers throughout the genome. Many of the enhancers colocalized with ion channel genes repressed by TBX3, including the clustered sodium channel genes Scn5a, essential for cardiac function, and Scn10a. We identified 2 enhancers in the Scn5a/Scn10a locus, which were regulated by TBX3 and its family member and activator, TBX5, and are functionally conserved in humans. We also provided evidence that a SNP in the SCN10A enhancer associated with alterations in cardiac conduction patterns in humans disrupts TBX3/TBX5 binding and reduces the cardiac activity of the enhancer in vivo. Thus, the identification of key regulatory elements for cardiac conduction helps to explain how genetic variants in noncoding regulatory DNA sequences influence the regulation of cardiac conduction and the predisposition for cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available