4.8 Article

Estrogen receptor-α signaling in osteoblast progenitors stimulates cortical bone accrual

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 394-404

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI65910

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [P01 AG13918, R01 AR56679, R01 AR49794]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development [I01 BX000514, I01 BX000436, I01 BX000294, I01 BX001405]
  3. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Translational Research Institute
  4. Marques de Valdecilla Foundation, Santander, Spain
  5. University of Pisa, Italy
  6. Tobacco Settlement Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) in osteoblasts and osteoclasts over 20 years ago suggested that direct effects of estrogens on both of these cell types are responsible for their beneficial effects on the skeleton, but the role of ER alpha in osteoblast lineage cells has remained elusive. In addition, estrogen activation of ER alpha in osteoclasts can only account for the protective effect of estrogens on the cancellous, but not the cortical, bone compartment that represents 80% of the entire skeleton. Here, we deleted ER alpha at different stages of differentiation in murine osteoblast lineage cells. We found that ER alpha in osteoblast progenitors expressing Osterix1 (Osx1) potentiates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, thereby increasing proliferation and differentiation of periosteal cells. Further, this signaling pathway was required for optimal cortical bone accrual at the periosteum in mice. Notably, this function did not require estrogens. The osteoblast progenitor ER alpha mediated a protective effect of estrogens against endocortical, but not cancellous, bone resorption. ER alpha in mature osteoblasts or osteocytes did not influence cancellous or cortical bone mass. Hence, the ER alpha in both osteoblast progenitors and osteoclasts functions to optimize bone mass but at distinct bone compartments and in response to different cues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available