4.8 Article

Extrathymic development of murine T cells after bone marrow transplantation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 4716-4726

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI60630

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-HL069929, R01-CA107096, R01-AI080455, T32 AIO7621, K08CA160659-01]
  2. US Department of Defense: USAMRAA award [W81XWH-09-1-0294]
  3. Radiation Effects Research Foundation,(RERF-NIAID)
  4. Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  5. William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin
  6. Lymphoma Foundation
  7. Alex's Lemonade Stand
  8. Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  9. Peter Solomon Fund
  10. Starr Stem Cell Scholar Fellowship
  11. CRI Tumor Immunology Predoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restoring T cell competence is a significant clinical challenge in patients whose thymic function is severely compromised due to age or cytoreductive conditioning. Here, we demonstrate in Mice that mesenteric LNs (MLNs) support extrathymic T cell development in euthymic and athymic recipients of bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Furthermore, in aged murine BMT recipients, the contribution of the MLNs to the generation of T cells was maintained, while the contribution of the thymus was Significantly impaired. Thymic impairment resulted in a proportional increase in extrathymic-derived T cell progenitors. Extrathymic development in athymic recipients generated conventional naive TCR alpha beta T cells with a broad V beta repertoire and intact functional and proliferative potential. Moreover, in the absence of a functional thymus, immunity against known pathogens could be augmented using engineered precursor T cells with viral specificity These findings demonstrate the potential of extrathymic T cell development for T cell reconstitution in patients with limited thymic function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available