4.8 Article

The VLDL receptor promotes lipotoxicity and increases mortality in mice following an acute myocardial infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 2625-2640

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI43068

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  4. Swedish Diabetes Society
  5. Torsten, and Ragnar Soderberg Foundation
  6. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  7. NIH [HL054710]
  8. European Union
  9. Lipidomic Net.
  10. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF11OC1014864] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impaired cardiac function is associated with myocardial triglyceride accumulation, but it is not clear how the lipids accumulate or whether this accumulation is detrimental. Here we show that hypoxia/ischemia-induced accumulation of lipids in HL-1 cardiomyocytes and mouse hearts is dependent on expression of the VLDL receptor (VLDLR). Hypoxia-induced VLDLR expression in HL-1 cells was dependent on HIF-1 alpha through its interaction with a hypoxia-responsive element in the Vldlr promoter, and VLDLR promoted the endocytosis of lipoproteins. Furthermore, VLDLR expression was higher in ischemic compared with nonischemic left ventricles from human hearts and was correlated with the total lipid droplet area in the cardiomyocytes. Importantly, Vldlr(-/-) mice showed improved survival and decreased infarct area following an induced myocardial infarction. ER stress, which leads to apoptosis, is known to be involved in ischemic heart disease. We found that ischemia-induced ER stress and apoptosis in mouse hearts were reduced in Vldlr(-/-) mice and in mice treated with antibodies specific for VLDLR. These findings suggest that VLDLR-induced lipid accumulation in the ischemic heart worsens survival by increasing ER stress and apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available