4.8 Article

Tie1 attenuation reduces murine atherosclerosis in a dose-dependent and shear stress-specific manner

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 1624-1635

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI42040

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [T32 GM007347-31, RL1 HL0952551, MOD FY07-513, 65709, 57986, HL065405, HL086988, DK59637]
  2. American Heart Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the response of endothelial cells to the disturbed blood flow in the vicinity of atherosclerotic lesions is known to be distinct from that elicited by nonatherogenic laminar flow, the mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Our initial studies confirmed that expression of the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase Tiel was evident at regions of atherogenic flow in mature animals. We therefore hypothesized that Tiel plays a role in the endothelial response to atherogenic shear stress. Consistent with this, we found that Tie1(+/-) mice bred to the apoE-deficient background displayed a 35% reduction in atherosclerosis relative to Tie1(+/+);Apoe(-/-) mice. Since deletion of Tiel results in embryonic lethality secondary to vascular dysfunction, we used conditional and inducible mutagenesis to study the effect of endothelial-specific Tiel attenuation on atherogenesis in Apoe(-/-) mice and found a dose-dependent decrease in atherosclerotic lesions. Analysis of primary aortic endothelial cells indicated that atheroprotective laminar flow decreased Tiel expression in vitro. Attenuation of Tie I was associated with an increase in eNOS expression and Tie2 phosphorylation. In addition, Tiel attenuation increased IkB alpha, expression while decreasing ICAM levels. In summary, we have found that shear stress conditions that modulate atherogenic events also regulate Tiel expression. Therefore, Tiel may play a novel proinflammatory role in atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available