4.8 Article

CD13 is a therapeutic target in human liver cancer stem cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 120, Issue 9, Pages 3326-3339

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI42550

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [20012039, 21229015, 21790274]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20012039, 21592014, 21790274] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are generally dormant or slowly cycling tumor cells that have the ability to reconstitute tumors. They are thought to be involved in tumor resistance to chemo/radiation therapy and tumor relapse and progression. However, neither their existence nor their identity within many cancers has been well defined. Here, we have demonstrated that CD13 is a marker for semiquiescent CSCs in human liver cancer cell lines and clinical samples and that targeting these cells might provide a way to treat this disease. CD13(+) cells predominated in the G(0) phase of the cell cycle and typically formed cellular clusters in cancer foci. Following treatment, these cells survived and were enriched along the fibrous capsule where liver cancers usually relapse. Mechanistically, CD13 reduced ROS-induced DNA damage after genotoxic chemo/radiation stress and protected cells from apoptosis. In mouse xenograft models, combination of a CD13 inhibitor and the genotoxic chemotherapeutic fluorouracil (5-FU) drastically reduced tumor volume compared with either agent alone. 5-FU inhibited CD90(+) proliferating CSCs, some of which produce CD13(+) semiquiescent CSCs, while CD13 inhibition suppressed the self-renewing and tumor-initiating ability of dormant CSCs. Therefore, combining a CD13 inhibitor with a ROS-inducing chemo/radiation therapy may improve the treatment of liver cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available