4.8 Article

Excess adenosine in murine penile erectile tissues contributes to priapism via A2B adenosine receptor signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 1491-1501

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI33467

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL070952, R01 HL070952] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK077748, R01 DK046207, DK46207, R21 DK077748] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Priapism, abnormally prolonged penile erection in the absence of sexual excitation, is associated with ischemia-mediated erectile tissue damage and subsequent erectile dysfunction. It is common among males with sickle cell disease (SCD), and SCD transgenic mice are an accepted model of the disorder. Current strategies to manage priapism suffer from a poor fundamental understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the disorder. Here we report that mice lacking adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme necessary for the breakdown of adenosine, displayed unexpected priapic activity. ADA enzyme therapy successfully corrected the priapic activity both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that it was dependent on elevated adenosine levels. Further genetic and pharmacologic evidence demonstrated that A(2B) adenosine receptor-mediated (A(2B)R-mediated) CAMP and cGMP induction was required for elevated adenosine-induced prolonged penile erection. Finally, priapic activity in SCD transgenic mice was also caused by elevated adenosine levels and A(2B)R activation. Thus, we have shown that excessive adenosine accumulation in the penis contributes to priapism through increased A(2B)R signaling in both Ada(-/-) and SCD transgenic mice. These findings provide insight regarding the molecular basis of priapism and suggest that strategies to either reduce adenosine or block A(2B)R activation may prove beneficial in the treatment of this disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available