4.6 Article

Chronic Granulomatous Disease: Two Decades of Experience From a Tertiary Care Centre in North West India

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 58-67

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-013-9963-5

Keywords

Chronic granulomatous disease; NADPH oxidase; CYBB gene; NCF-1 gene; dihydrorhodamine

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293250] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) results from an inherited defect in the phagocytic cells of the immune system. It is a genetically heterogenous disease caused by defects in one of the five major subunits of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex. There is a paucity of data from India on CGD. We herein describe the clinical features in 17 children with CGD from a single tertiary referral center in India. A detailed analysis of the clinical features, laboratory investigations and outcome of 17 children 7 with X-linked (XL) and 10 with autosomal recessive (AR) form was performed. Diagnosis of CGD was based on an abnormal granulocyte oxidative burst evaluated by either Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) test or flow cytometry based Dihyrorhodamine 123 assay or both. The molecular diagnosis was confirmed by genetic mutation analysis in 13 cases. The mean age at diagnosis and the age at onset of symptoms was significantly lower in children diagnosed with XL- CGD compared those with AR disease. Mutations were detected in CYBB gene in 6 patients with XL-CGD and NCF-1 gene mutations were observed in 7 cases of AR- CGD. The course and outcome of the disease was much worse in children diagnosed with X-linked form of disease compared to AR forms of the disease; 4/7 (57 %) children with X-CGD were dead at the time of data analysis. This is one of the largest series on chronic granulomatous disease from any developing country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available