4.6 Article

Increased Pro-inflammatory Cytokine Production After Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation in Patients with X-linked Agammaglobulinemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 967-974

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-012-9706-z

Keywords

X-linked agammaglobulinemia; Bruton's tyrosine kinase; LPS signaling; inflammatory response; TIRAP

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT, Mexico) [56836, 153733]
  2. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Distrito Federal [ICYTDF/326/2009]
  3. Fundacion para ninas y ninos con inmunodeficiencias primarias A.C.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine response by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from XLA patients. Thirteen patients with XLA were included in the study. LPS-induced TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-10 production was determined in PBMCs from patients and matched healthy controls by ELISA. Cytokine production was correlated with the severity of mutation, affected domain and clinical characteristics. In response to LPS, PBMCs from XLA patients produced significantly higher amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines and IL-10 compared to controls, and this production was influenced neither by the severity of the mutation nor the affected domain. PBMCs from patients with a history of more hospital admissions before their diagnosis produced higher levels of TNF-alpha. PBMCs from patients with lower serum IgA levels showed a higher production of TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta. Less severe (punctual) mutations in the Btk gene were associated with higher serum IgG levels at diagnosis. Our results demonstrate a predominantly inflammatory response in XLA patients after LPS stimulation and suggest a deregulation of TLR signaling in the absence of Btk. This response may be influenced by environmental factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available