4.6 Article

Mechanisms of IVIG Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages S65-S69

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-010-9398-1

Keywords

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; CIDP; intravenous immunoglobulin; IVIG

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common treatable acquired chronic polyneuropathy. Corticosteroids, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been shown to be effective in randomized controlled clinical trials and IVIG is widely used as a first-line initial and maintenance treatment for CIDP. Studies in animal models of autoimmune diseases indicated that the inhibitory Fc-gamma receptor Fc gamma RIIB, expressed on myeloid cells and B cells, is required for the anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG. We found that untreated patients with CIDP, compared to demographically matched healthy controls, show lower Fc gamma RIIB expression levels on na < ve B cells and fail to upregulate or to maintain upregulation of Fc gamma RIIB as B cells progress from the naive to the memory compartment. Furthermore, Fc gamma RIIB protein expression is upregulated on B cells and monocytes following clinically effective IVIG therapy suggesting that impaired expression of the inhibitory Fc gamma R in CIDP can, at least partially, be restored by IVIG treatment. In B cells, Fc gamma RIIB transduces an inhibitory signal upon colligation with the B cell receptor, thereby preventing B cells with low affinity or self-reactive receptors from entering the germinal center and becoming IgG positive plasma cells. Our data suggest that this late B cell differentiation checkpoint is impaired in CIDP. Modulating Fc gamma RIIB function might be a promising approach to efficiently limit antibody-mediated immunopathology in CIDP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available