4.3 Article

Estimation of 24-Hour Sodium Excretion from Spot Urine Samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 174-180

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00241.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Julia and Seymour Gross Foundation
  2. Allied Minds, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the effects of sodium intake on blood pressure and on response to antihypertensive medication, sodium intake is rarely monitored in clinical practice. The current method, the 24-hour urine collection for sodium excretion, is cumbersome, often incorrectly performed, and not commonly ordered. Further, its results have limited meaning because of the substantial day-to-day variation in sodium intake. A spot urine test to enable convenient, inexpensive, and serial monitoring of sodium excretion would be desirable. In this study, the accuracy of predicting 24-hour sodium excretion from a spot urine sample was assessed. The urine sodium/creatinine ratio was determined from the following urine samples: an AM sample, submitted at the beginning of the 24-hour urine collection; a PM sample collected in the later afternoon/early evening before dinner, at roughly the midpoint of the collection; and a random sample, collected after its completion. The ratio was then corrected for 24-hour creatinine excretion. The strongest correlation between predicted and actual 24-hour sodium excretion was observed with the PM sample collected near the midpoint (r=0.86, P <.001). This sample also identified persons with sodium excretion < 100 mEq/d with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 82%. The sodium/creatinine ratio from a spot urine sample collected in the late afternoon/early evening at roughly the midpoint of the 24-hour collection, and adjusted for 24-hour creatinine excretion, strongly correlated with 24-hour sodium excretion. Additional studies are merited to further evaluate the role of the spot urine sample in assessing sodium intake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available