Spleen-preserving Distal Pancreatectomy or Distal Pancreatectomy With Splenectomy? Perioperative and Patient-reported Outcome Analysis

Goals: We designed this study to evaluate the efficacy of spleen salvage during distal pancreatectomy for patients with benign and borderline malignant tumors. Background: Despite the emphasis on its role, the spleen has commonly been removed in distal pancreatectomy. Study: From January 2005 to July 2009, 82 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) and 78 patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP). Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics, final diagnoses, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, and operative time between the 2 groups. More perioperative complications occurred in the DPS group than in the SPDP group (P = 0.0344). Consequently, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SPDP group than in the DPS group (P = 0.0273). In the follow-up survey, episodes of common cold or flu were apparently more frequent in the DPS group (P = 0.047). More patients in the DPS group felt fatigue (P = 0.0481) and poor health condition (P = 0.0371). Less newly developed (P = 0.0193) and aggravated diabetes mellitus (P = 0.0361) were also observed in the SPDP group. Platelet counts on postoperative day (POD) 5, hemoglobin on POD 3, WBC counts, and CRP level on POD 2 were significantly higher in the DPS group than in the SPDP group and these differences continued to be significant for months after surgery. Conclusions: In addition to frequent higher grade complications, prolonged hospital stays, and severe hematological abnormalities, DPS seemed to result in poor health condition based on the follow-up survey. Even an effort to preserve an adult spleen in distal pancreatectomy is worthwhile.