4.4 Article

Novel Evidence for Chronic Exposure to Endotoxin in Human Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 149-152

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181e12c24

Keywords

antibodies to endotoxin; EndoCab; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; leaky gut

Funding

  1. Senter Novem Innovation Oriented Research Program on Genomics [IGE05012]
  2. Transnational University Limburg (TUL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endotoxin is hypothesized to play an important role in the activation of inflammatory pathways associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, demonstration of hepatic endotoxin exposure is challenging due to the inaccessibility of the portal circulation. Furthermore, reliable measurement of the relatively low endotoxin levels in plasma of patients with liver disease and subsequent interpretation remain difficult. Goals: In this study, we used the EndoCab assay that measures endogenous antibodies to the core region of endotoxin to estimate hepatic endotoxin exposure over time. Study: IgG levels against endotoxin were measured in peripheral plasma obtained from 21 severely obese patients with NASH and 9 severely obese patients with healthy livers. Results: Plasma IgG levels against endotoxin were significantly elevated in patients with NASH compared with patients with healthy livers (48 +/- 63GMU/mL vs. 10 +/- 13GMU/mL). Moreover, these IgG levels progressively increased with NASH grade (grade 1 29 +/- 37; grade 2 58 +/- 51; grade 3 84 +/- 132GMU/mL, P < 0.05). There was no relation between plasma IgG levels and NASH stage. Conclusions: Plasma IgG levels against endotoxin were found to be increased in biopsy-proven human NASH and increased with aggravated inflammation in NASH, suggesting a relationship between chronic endotoxin exposure and the severity of human NASH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available