4.6 Article

Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 9, Pages 989-995

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.02.018

Keywords

Medications; Polypharmacy cutoff; Geriatric syndromes; Functional outcomes; Mortality; Older adults

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [301916]
  2. Sydney Medical School Foundation
  3. Aging and Alzheimer's Research Foundation
  4. Geoff and Elaine Penney Aging Research Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to determine an optimal discriminating number of concomitant medications associated with geriatric syndromes, functional outcomes, and mortality in community-dwelling older men. Study Design and Setting: Older men aged >= 70 years (n = 1,705), enrolled in the Concord Health and Aging in Men Project were studied. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using the Youden Index and the area under the curve was performed to determine discriminating number of medications in relation to each outcome. Results: The highest value of the Youden Index for frailty was obtained for a cutoff point of 6.5 medications compared with a cutoff of 5.5 for disability and 3.5 for cognitive impairment. For mortality and incident falls, the highest value of Youden Index was obtained for a cutoff of 4.5 medications. For every one increase in number of medications, the adjusted odds ratios were 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.21) for frailty, 1.08 (95% CI = 1.00-1.15) for disability, 1.09 (95% CI = 1.04-1.15) for mortality, and 1.07 (95% CI = 1.03-1.12) for incident falls. There was no association between increasing number of medications and cognitive impairment. Conclusion: The study supports the use of five or more medications in the current definition of polypharmacy to estimate the medication-related adverse effects for frailty, disability, mortality, and falls. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available