4.6 Review

Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 10, Pages 1041-1051

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005

Keywords

Patient complexity; Chronic conditions; Comorbidity; Access barriers; Adherence; Outcomes; Burden

Funding

  1. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To design a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity with practical applicability to analytic design and clinical practice. Existing literature on patient complexity has mainly identified its components descriptively and in isolation, lacking clarity as to their combined functions in disrupting care or to how complexity changes over time. Study Design and Setting: The authors developed a cumulative complexity model, which integrates existing literature and emphasizes how clinical and social factors accumulate and interact to complicate patient care. A narrative literature review is used to explicate the model. Results: The model emphasizes a core, patient-level mechanism whereby complicating factors impact care and outcomes: the balance between patient workload of demands and patient capacity to address demands. Workload encompasses the demands on the patient's time and energy, including demands of treatment, self-care, and life in general. Capacity concerns ability to handle work (e.g., functional morbidity, financial/social resources, literacy). Workload-capacity imbalances comprise the mechanism driving patient complexity. Treatment and illness burdens serve as feedback loops, linking negative outcomes to further imbalances, such that complexity may accumulate over time. Conclusion: With its components largely supported by existing literature, the model has implications for analytic design, clinical epidemiology, and clinical practice. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available