Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 825-830Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.010
Keywords
Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Clinical trials; Type I error; Multiplicity; Sequential testing
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To estimate the extent to which the practice of periodically updating meta-analyses causes inflation of the type I error and then to compare the estimate with the inflation caused by publication bias. We also present a simple method to adjust for the inflation associated with updating meta-analyses. Study Design and Setting: Simulations were used to estimate the error rates. Results: In general, updating meta-analyses caused 2- to 5-fold inflation of the type I error rates, which exceeded the inflation caused by publication bias. As a rule of thumb, the results of a meta-analysis are robust up to 5, 10, 15, or 22 updates, if the P-value multiplied by 4, 6, 8, or 10 remains below the desired significance level. Conclusion: Meta-analyses are likely to be updated until a clear conclusion is reached. Therefore, it is important to take the inflation of the error rate into account to interpret the results correctly. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available