4.6 Article

Self-reported data on reproductive variables were reliable among postmenopausal women

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 9, Pages 945-950

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.001

Keywords

health survey; cohort study; reproducibility; reproductive history; menopausal women; educational status

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [POCI/SAU-ESP/61160/2004, POCI/SAU-ESP/56126/2004, POCI/SAU-ESP/61685/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [POCI/SAU-ESP/61160/2004, POCI/SAU-ESP/61685/2004, POCI/SAU-ESP/56126/2004] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We aimed to assess the reliability of self-reported reproductive variables in postmenopausal women. Study Design and Setting: We evaluated 535 women in two interviews, as part of the recruitment and first follow-up of a cohort of Portuguese adults. Median time between evaluations was 5 years. Women were inquired about sociodemographic characteristics, cognitive status, and reproductive history: gravidity, parity, lifetime use of oral contraceptives, menopausal status, age at menopause, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and lifetime use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Results: Age at menopause was consistent within 1 year for 66% of women and agreement was higher in women reporting surgical menopause. Reliability regarding age at menopause decreased with time since menopause. Gravidity was consistent for 81% of women, whereas parity was consistent for 94%. The proportion of different answers regarding number of pregnancies and number of live births was higher in women with high gravidity and parity, respectively. Agreement was 96% for hysterectomy and 92% for oophorectomy. The proportion of consistent reports was 90% for oral contraceptives and 93% for HRT. Women with higher education reported parity and HRT more reliably. Conclusion: Agreement was over 90% for self-reported parity, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and HRT, which supports their use in analytical studies. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available