4.7 Article

Lung Metastasis in Pediatric Thyroid Cancer: Radiological Pattern, Molecular Genetics, Response to Therapy, and Outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 103-110

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01690

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Lung metastases are common in pediatric thyroid cancer (TC). We present an analysis of a series of lung metastases in pediatric TC. Patients and Methods: Data from 20 patients (16 females, 4 males; median age, 14.5 years; range 10 to 18 years) were analyzed. The tumors included differentiated TC in 19 patients and poorly differentiated TC in 1 patient. Results: Lung metastasis presented with three distinct radiological patterns: lung uptake on diagnostic radioactive iodine whole body scan (DxWBS) only in 3 patients (15%); lung uptake on DxWBS and CT scan as micrometastases (# 1 cm) in 16 patients (80%); and lung uptake on DxWBS and CT scan as macrometastases (<= 1 cm) in 1 patient (5%). Iodine-131 therapies were administered to all patients (median, three; range one to eight) with a median cumulative administered activity of 317.5 mCi (range, 109 to 682 mCi). None of the patients achieved a complete response but the biochemical response was substantial. During a median follow-up period of 8.2 years (range, 0.75 to 16.3 years), 1 patient (5%) died, 1 patient (5%) had a biochemically incomplete response, 2 patients (10%) had an indeterminate response, 1 patient (5%) had progressive structural disease, and 14 patients (70%) had stable structural disease. Mutational testing of 10 of 20 tumors revealed only two PIK3CA mutations in a single tumor. Conclusions: Lung metastases are common in pediatric TC and present most frequently with bilateral radioiodine-avid micrometastases. Known single point mutations in adult TC are rare in pediatric TC. The biochemical response to iodine-131 can be substantial but resolution of structural abnormalities is rare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available