4.7 Article

Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages 3570-3579

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1414

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G1000467] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G1000467] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G1000467] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common clinical problem. The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the use of diagnostic tests for this condition in clinical practice. Participants: This subgroup was constituted by the Steering Committee to address key questions related to the diagnosis of PHPT. Consensus was established at a closed meeting of the Expert Panel that followed. Evidence: Each question was addressed by a relevant literature search (on PubMed), and the data were presented for discussion at the group meeting. Consensus Process: Consensus was achieved by a group meeting. Statements were prepared by all authors, with comments relating to accuracy from the diagnosis subgroup and by representatives from the participating professional societies. Conclusions: We conclude that: 1) reference ranges should be established for serum PTH in vitamin D-replete healthy individuals; 2) second-and third-generation PTH assays are both helpful in the diagnosis of PHPT; 3) normocalcemic PHPT is a variant of the more common presentation of PHPT with hypercalcemia; 4) serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations should be measured and, if vitamin D insufficiency is present, it should be treated as part of any management course; 5) genetic testing has the potential to be useful in the differential diagnosis of familial hyperparathyroidism or hypercalcemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available