4.7 Article

Evidence for Decreased Expression of ADAMTS-1 Associated With Impaired Oocyte Quality in PCOS Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages E1015-E1021

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-4177

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100470]
  2. Sun Yat-Sen University [12ykpy24]
  3. Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine of Guangdong Province [2012A06140003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of dysfunctional ovulation-affecting female fertility. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin-like motifs (ADAMTS-1) is required for normal ovulation and subsequent fertilization, and the expression of ADAMTS-1 may be altered in PCOS granulosa cell (GC)-reflecting abnormalities in ovulatory signaling. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the differential expression of ADAMTS-1 in PCOS patients associated with impaired oocyte quality. Design and Setting: A prospective comparative experimental study was performed at a clinical reproductive medicine center. Patients: Women with PCOS (n = 40) and normovulatory controls (n = 40) undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization were recruited in our study. Main Outcome Measures: Differential expression of ADAMTS-1 in GCs was analyzed with immunocytochemistry in PCOS patients and normal controls, and ADAMTS-1 mRNA expression was quantified by RT-PCR. Furthermore, the correlation between ADAMTS-1 mRNA and oocyte quality was analyzed. Results: The expression of ADAMTS-1 was decreased in PCOS patients compared with normally ovulating women and was closely related to lower oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, and fertilization rate. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that the dysregulated expression of ADAMTS-1 in PCOS may influence oocyte quality-via GCs-oocyte paracrine and endocrine mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available