4.7 Article

Generic and Brand-Name L-Thyroxine Are Not Bioequivalent for Children With Severe Congenital Hypothyroidism

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 610-617

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-3125

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [MO1-RR02172]
  2. Harvard Catalyst/The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH) [UL1 RR 025758]
  3. Harvard University
  4. NIH [5T32DK007699-23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: In the United States, generic substitution of levothyroxine (L-T-4) by pharmacists is permitted if the formulations are deemed to be bioequivalent by the Federal Drug Administration, but there is widespread concern that the pharmacokinetic standard used is too insensitive. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a brand-name L-T-4 (Synthroid) and an AB-rated generic formulation (Sandoz, Princeton, NJ) in children with severe hypothyroidism. Design: This was a prospective randomized crossover study in which patients received 8 weeks of one L-T-4 formulation followed by 8 weeks of the other. Setting: The setting was an academic medical center. Patients: Of 31 children with an initial serum TSH concentration >100 mU/L, 20 had congenital hypothyroidism (CH), and 11 had autoimmune thyroiditis. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was the serum TSH concentration. Secondary endpoints were the free T-4 and total T-3 concentrations. Results: The serum TSH concentration was significantly lower after 8 weeks of Synthroid than after generic drug (P = .002), but thyroid hormone levels did not differ significantly. Subgroup analysis revealed that the difference in TSH was restricted to patients with CH (P = .0005). Patients with CH required a higher L-T-4 dose (P < .0004) and were younger (P = .003) but were not resistant to thyroid hormone; 15 of 16 CH patients had severe thyroid dysgenesis or agenesis on imaging. The response to generic vs brand-name preparation remained significant when adjusted for age. Conclusions: Synthroid and an AB-rated generic L-T-4 are not bioequivalent for patients with severe hypothyroidism due to CH, probably because of diminished thyroid reserve. It would therefore seem prudent not to substitute L-T-4 formulations in patients with severe CH, particularly in those <3 yr of age. Our results may have important implications for other severely hypothyroid patients in whom precise titration of L-T-4 is necessary. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 610-617, 2013)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available