4.7 Article

Place of Cabergoline in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages 1327-1335

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-2443

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Ipsen
  3. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Cabergoline is widely considered to be poorly effective in acromegaly. Objective: The aim of this study was to obtain a more accurate picture of the efficacy of cabergoline in acromegaly, both alone and in combination with somatostatin analogs. Design: We systematically reviewed all trials of cabergoline therapy for acromegaly published up to 2009 in four databases (PubMed, Pascal, Embase, and Google Scholar). We identified 15 studies (11 prospective) with a total of 237 patients; none were randomized or placebo-controlled. A meta-analysis was conducted on individual data (n = 227). Results: Cabergoline was used alone in nine studies. Fifty-one (34%) of the 149 patients achieved normal IGF-I levels. In multivariate analysis, the decline in IGF-I was related to the baseline IGF-I concentration (beta = 1.16; P < 0.001), treatment duration (beta = 0.28; P < 0.001), and baseline prolactin concentration (beta = -0.18; P = 0.01), and with a trend toward a relation with the cabergoline dose (beta = 0.38; P = 0.07). In five studies, cabergoline was added to ongoing somatostatin analog treatment that had failed to normalize IGF-I. Forty patients (52%) achieved normal IGF-I levels. The change in IGF-I was significantly related to the baseline IGF-I level (beta = 0.74; P < 0.001) but not to the dose of cabergoline, the duration of treatment, or the baseline prolactin concentration. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that cabergoline single-agent therapy normalizes IGF-I levels in one third of patients with acromegaly. When a somatostatin analog fails to control acromegaly, cabergoline adjunction normalizes IGF-I in about 50% of cases. This effect may occur even in patients with normoprolactinemia. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: 1327-1335, 2011)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available