4.7 Article

Induction of Spermatogenesis and Fertility during Gonadotropin Treatment of Gonadotropin-Deficient Infertile Men: Predictors of Fertility Outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 801-808

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1648

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [511929]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The induction of spermatogenesis and fertility with gonadotropin therapy in gonadotropin-deficient men varies in rate and extent. Understanding the predictors of response would inform clinical practice but requires multivariate analyses in sufficiently large clinical cohorts that are suitably detailed and frequently assessed. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 75 men, with 72 desiring fertility, was treated at two academic andrology centers for a total of 116 courses of therapy from 1981-2008. Outcomes: Semen analysis and testicular examination were performed every 3 months. Results: A total of 38 men became fathers, including five through assisted reproduction. The median time to achieve first sperm was 7.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-10.1]) and for conception was 28.2 months (95% CI 21.6-38.5). The median sperm concentration at conception for unassisted pregnancies was 8.0 M/ml (95% CI 0.2-59.5). Multivariate correlated time-to-event analyses show that larger testis volume, previous treatment with gonadotropins, and no previous androgen use each independently predicts faster induction of spermatogenesis and unassisted pregnancy. Conclusions: Larger testis volume is a useful prognostic indicator of response. The association of slower responses after prior androgen therapy suggests that faster pregnancy rates might be achieved by substituting gonadotropin for androgen therapy for pubertal induction, although a prospective randomized trial will be required to prove this. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 801-808, 2009)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available