Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 449-457Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.020
Keywords
Bone densitometry; model discrimination; prediction models; prevalent vertebral fracture; vertebral fracture assessment
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
- National Institute on Aging
- National Center for Research Resources
- NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [U01 AR45580, U01 AR45614, U01 AR45632, U01 AR45647, U01 AR45654, U01 AR45583, U01 AG18197, U01-AG027810, UL1 TR000128]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
No studies have compared how well different prediction models discriminate older men who have a radiographic prevalent vertebral fracture (PVFx) from those who do not. We used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and a net reclassification index to compare how well regression-derived prediction models and nonregression prediction tools identify PVFx among men age >= 65 yr with femoral neck T-score of -1.0 or less enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. The area under receiver operating characteristic for a model with age, bone mineral density, and historical height loss (HHL) was 0.682 compared with 0.692 for a complex model with age, bone mineral density, HHL, prior non-spine fracture, body mass index, back pain, grip strength, smoking, and glucocorticoid use (p values for difference in 5 bootstrapped samples 0.14-0.92). This complex model, using a cutpoint prevalence of 5%, correctly reclassified only a net 5.7% (p = 0.13) of men as having or not having a PVFx compared with a simple criteria list (age >= 80 yr, HHL > 4 cm, or glucocorticoid use). In conclusion, simple criteria identify older men with PVFx and regression-based models. Future research to identify additional risk factors that more accurately identify older men with PVFx is needed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available