4.1 Article

Multiple free-radical scavenging capacity in serum

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 117-121

Publisher

JOURNAL CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & NUTRITION
DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.11-113

Keywords

multiple free radical; MULTIS; serum; ESR spin trapping; chronic kidney disease

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23700897] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a method to determine serum scavenging-capacity profile against multiple free radical species, namely hydroxyl radical, superoxide radical, alkoxyl radical, alkylperoxyl radical, alkyl radical, and singlet oxygen. This method was applied to a cohort of chronic kidney disease patients. Each free radical species was produced with a common experimental procedure; i.e., uv/visible-light photolysis of free-radical precursor/sensitizer. The decrease in free-radical concentration by the presence of serum was quantified with electron spin resonance spin trapping method, from which the scavenging capacity was calculated. There was a significant capacity change in the disease group (n = 45) as compared with the healthy control group (n = 30). The percent values of disease's scavenging capacity with respect to control group indicated statistically significant differences in all free-radical species except alkylperoxyl radical, i.e., hydroxyl radical, 73 +/- 12% (p = 0.001); superoxide radical, 158 +/- 50% (p = 0.001); alkoxyl radical, 121 +/- 30% (p = 0.005); alkylperoxyl radical, 123 +/- 32% (p>0.1); alkyl radical, 26 +/- 14% (p = 0.001); and singlet oxygen, 57 +/- 18% (p = 0.001). The scavenging capacity profile was illustrated using a radar chart, clearly demonstrating the characteristic change in the disease group. Although the cause of the scavenging capacity change by the disease state is not completely understood, the profile of multiple radical scavenging capacities may become a useful diagnostic tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available