4.6 Article

Intrathecal baclofen for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 486-492

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.019

Keywords

Anesthesia, Spinal; Baclofen, Intrathecal; Knee arthroplasty

Categories

Funding

  1. GCRC [5MO1 RR00997]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: To determine whether intrathecal baclofen is an effective adjunctive agent to decrease acute and chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Setting: Operating room and inpatient units of a university hospital. Patients: 60 adult, ASA physical status I, II, and III patients presenting for total knee arthroplasty. Interventions: Anesthesia was provided by spinal injection of 15 mg of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with either 100 mcg baclofen or saline. Sedation was provided with intravenous midazolam and propofol. Measurements: Data were collected on adverse effects, opioid usage, and verbal pain scale (VPS) from 0 to 10. The study period was divided into six discrete time intervals that included the 1(st) 72-hour postoperative period and a three-month post-discharge follow-up telephone call. Main Results: The baclofen group used less morphine in the PACU than the control group (5 mg vs. 9.3 mg; P = 0.04). VPS were lower in the baclofen group than the treatment group, but significant differences could be demonstrated only in the time periods 48-72 hours and three months postoperatively. At three months, fewer patients in the baclofen group reported pain than the control group (8/27 vs. 19/29; P = 0.009). Regression analysis showed that the baclofen group was 4.5 times less likely to report pain at three months (95% CI: 1.5-16.6). Conclusions: IT baclofen used as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty allows for less postoperative opioid usage and less chronic pain at three months. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available