4.7 Article

Predictability of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 4531-4543

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00624.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NOAA/Climate Program Office Climate Test Bed [GC10-287a]
  2. ONR Marine Meteorology Program [ONRBAA12-001]
  3. NSF Climate and Large-Scale Dynamics Program [AGS-1221013, AGS-1228302]
  4. NOAA/MAPP Program [NA12OAR4310075]
  5. APEC Climate Center, Global Research Laboratory (GRL) [MEST 2011-0021927]
  6. IPRC
  7. JAMSTEC
  8. NOAA
  9. NASA
  10. Directorate For Geosciences [1228302] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1228302] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Korea Meteorological Institute (KMI) [APCC12-01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  13. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0021927] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) represents a primary source of predictability on the intraseasonal time scales and its influence extends from seasonal variations to weather and extreme events. While the last decade has witnessed marked improvement in dynamical MJO prediction, an updated estimate of MJO predictability from a contemporary suite of dynamic models, in conjunction with an estimate of their corresponding prediction skill, is crucial for guiding future research and development priorities. In this study, the predictability of the boreal winter MJO is revisited based on the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE), a set of dedicated extended-range hindcasts from eight different coupled models. Two estimates of MJO predictability are made, based on single-member and ensemble-mean hindcasts, giving values of 20-30 days and 35-45 days, respectively. Exploring the dependence of predictability on the phase of MJO during hindcast initiation reveals a slightly higher predictability for hindcasts initiated from MJO phases 2, 3, 6, or 7 in three of the models with higher prediction skill. The estimated predictability of MJO initiated in phases 2 and 3 (i.e., convection in Indian Ocean with subsequent propagation across Maritime Continent) being equal to or higher than other MJO phases implies that the so-called Maritime Continent prediction barrier may not actually be an intrinsic predictability limitation. For most of the models, the skill for single-member (ensemble mean) hindcasts is less than the estimated predictability limit by about 5-10 days (15-25 days), implying that significantly more skillful MJO forecasts can be afforded through further improvements of dynamical models and ensemble prediction systems (EPS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available