4.7 Review

An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 263-275

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.020

Keywords

Social neuroscience; Neural systems; Social information processing; Social perception; Action observation; Mirror system; Imitation; Theory of mind; Mentalizing; Posterior superior temporal sulcus; Functional connectivity; Autism spectrum disorder; Psychiatric disorders

Funding

  1. Yale Child Study Center
  2. Autism Speaks Meixner Postdoctoral Fellowship in Translational Research [9284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the field of social neuroscience, major branches of research have been instrumental in describing independent components of typical and aberrant social information processing, but the field as a whole lacks a comprehensive model that integrates different branches. We review existing research related to the neural basis of three key neural systems underlying social information processing: social perception, action observation, and theory of mind. We propose an integrative model that unites these three processes and highlights the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), which plays a central role in all three systems. Furthermore, we integrate these neural systems with the dual system account of implicit and explicit social information processing. Large-scale meta-analyses based on Neurosynth confirmed that the pSTS is at the intersection of the three neural systems. Resting-state functional connectivity analysis with 1000 subjects confirmed that the pSTS is connected to all other regions in these systems. The findings presented in this review are specifically relevant for psychiatric research especially disorders characterized by social deficits such as autism spectrum disorder. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available