4.7 Article

Predictability of the Barents Sea Ice in Early Winter: Remote Effects of Oceanic and Atmospheric Thermal Conditions from the North Atlantic

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages 8884-8901

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00125.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [24241009]
  2. [22221001]
  3. [13J10583]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J10583, 24540470] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictability of sea ice concentrations (SICs) in the Barents Sea in early winter (November-December) is studied using canonical correlation analysis with atmospheric and ocean anomalies from the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data. It is found that the highest prediction skill for a single-predictor model is obtained from the 13-month lead subsurface temperature at 200-m depth (T200) and the in-phase meridional surface wind (V-sfc). T200 skillfully predicts SIC variability in 35% of the Barents Sea, mainly in the eastern side. The T200 for negative sea ice anomalies exhibits warm anomalies in the subsurface ocean temperature downstream of the Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current (NwASC) on a decadal time scale. The diagnostic analysis of NCEP CFSR data suggests that the subsurface temperature anomaly stored below the thermocline during summer reemerges in late autumn by atmospheric cooling and affects the sea ice. The subsurface temperature anomaly of the NwASC is advected from the North Atlantic subpolar gyre over; similar to 3 years. Also, V-sfc skillfully predicts SIC variability in 32% of the Barents Sea, mainly in the western side. The V-sfc for the negative sea ice anomalies exhibits southerly wind anomalies; V-sfc is related to the large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns from the subtropical North Atlantic to the Eurasian continent. This study suggests that both atmospheric and oceanic remote effects have a potential impact on the forecasting accuracy of SIC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available