4.7 Review

Repetition and variation in motor practice: A review of neural correlates

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 132-141

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.012

Keywords

Motor learning; Practice schedule; Contextual interference effect; Variability of practice; Random practice; Interleaved practice; Blocked practice; Constant practice; fMRI; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Primary motor cortex; Premotor cortex; Supplementary motor area; Parietal cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random practice results in more effective motor learning than either constant or blocked practice. Recent studies have investigated the effects of practice schedules at the neurophysiological level. This study aims to conduct a literature review of the following issues: (a) the differential involvement of premotor areas, the primary motor cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex in different types of practice; (b) changes in the participation of these areas throughout practice; and (c) the degree of support that current neurophysiological findings offer to strengthen the behavioral proposition that distinct cognitive processes are generated by different practice schedules. Data from 10 studies that investigated associations between practice structures and neurobiological substrates were analyzed. The participation of the indicated areas was found to depend on practice structure and varied during the learning process. Greater cognitive engagement was associated with random practice. In conclusion, distinct neural processes are engendered by different practice conditions. The integration of behavioral and neurophysiological findings promotes a more comprehensive view of the phenomenon. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available