4.7 Article

Sensitivity of Climate Change Detection and Attribution to the Characterization of Internal Climate Variability

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 3477-3491

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00622.1

Keywords

Climate change; Regression analysis; Statistical techniques; Time series

Funding

  1. King Abdulah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUK-C1-013-04]
  2. NOAA/DoE International Detection and Attribution Group (IDAG)
  3. ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy - Economic and Social Research Council
  4. Munich Re
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K006576/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. ESRC [ES/K006576/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) very likely statement that anthropogenic emissions are affecting climate is based on a statistical detection and attribution methodology that strongly depends on the characterization of internal climate variability. In this paper, the authors test the robustness of this statement in the case of global mean surface air temperature, under different representations of such variability. The contributions of the different natural and anthropogenic forcings to the global mean surface air temperature response are computed using a box diffusion model. Representations of internal climate variability are explored using simple stochastic models that nevertheless span a representative range of plausible temporal autocorrelation structures, including the short-memory first-order autoregressive [AR(1)] process and the long-memory fractionally differencing process. The authors find that, independently of the representation chosen, the greenhouse gas signal remains statistically significant under the detection model employed in this paper. The results support the robustness of the IPCC detection and attribution statement for global mean temperature change under different characterizations of internal variability, but they also suggest that a wider variety of robustness tests, other than simple comparisons of residual variance, should be performed when dealing with other climate variables and/or different spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available