4.7 Review

Assessment of the Performance of CORDEX Regional Climate Models in Simulating East African Rainfall

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 26, Issue 21, Pages 8453-8475

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00708.1

Keywords

ENSO; Rainfall; Climatology; Climate models; Model comparison; Interannual variability

Funding

  1. Global Change System for Analysis, Research, and Training (START)
  2. University of Cape Town's Climate Systems Analysis Group
  3. World Climate Research Program
  4. Climate and Development Knowledge Network
  5. International Centre for Theoretical Physics
  6. Swedish Meteorological-Hydrological Institute
  7. SOCOCA project in Department of Geoscience at University of Oslo (DoG/UiO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the ability of 10 regional climate models (RCMs) from the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) in simulating the characteristics of rainfall patterns over eastern Africa. The seasonal climatology, annual rainfall cycles, and interannual variability of RCM output have been assessed over three homogeneous subregions against a number of observational datasets. The ability of the RCMs in simulating large-scale global climate forcing signals is further assessed by compositing the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) events. It is found that most RCMs reasonably simulate the main features of the rainfall climatology over the three subregions and also reproduce the majority of the documented regional responses to ENSO and IOD forcings. At the same time the analysis shows significant biases in individual models depending on subregion and season; however, the ensemble mean has better agreement with observation than individual models. In general, the analysis herein demonstrates that the multimodel ensemble mean simulates eastern Africa rainfall adequately and can therefore be used for the assessment of future climate projections for the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available