4.7 Article

Climate Change from 1850 to 2005 Simulated in CESM1(WACCM)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages 7372-7391

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00558.1

Keywords

Atmosphere-ocean interaction; Middle atmosphere; Stratosphere; Climate change; Climate models; Coupled models

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Office of Science (BER) of the U.S. Department of Energy
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NCAR Community Earth System Model (CESM) now includes an atmospheric component that extends in altitude to the lower thermosphere. This atmospheric model, known as the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM), includes fully interactive chemistry, allowing, for example, a self-consistent representation of the development and recovery of the stratospheric ozone hole and its effect on the troposphere. This paper focuses on analysis of an ensemble of transient simulations using CESM1(WACCM), covering the period from the preindustrial era to present day, conducted as part of phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Variability in the stratosphere, such as that associated with stratospheric sudden warmings and the development of the ozone hole, is in good agreement with observations. The signals of these phenomena propagate into the troposphere, influencing near-surface winds, precipitation rates, and the extent of sea ice. In comparison of tropospheric climate change predictions with those from a version of CESM that does not fully resolve the stratosphere, the global-mean temperature trends are indistinguishable. However, systematic differences do exist in other climate variables, particularly in the extratropics. The magnitude of the difference can be as large as the climate change response itself. This indicates that the representation of stratosphere-troposphere coupling could be a major source of uncertainty in climate change projections in CESM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available