4.5 Article

INTERACTION BETWEEN HYPERTENSION AND CEREBRAL HYPOPERFUSION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION AND WHITE MATTER PATHOLOGY IN RATS

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 303, Issue -, Pages 115-125

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.056

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; hypertension; myelination; node of ranvier; white matter stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C1850]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2012R1A5A2051429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertension is the most significant modifiable risk factor for vascular cognitive impairment. However, influence of hypertension on the development of ischemic white matter injury and cognitive dysfunction is not fully understood. We compared cognitive functions and neuropathological outcomes of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induced by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) between normotensive rats (NRs) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). SHRs developed earlier and more severe deficits in spatial memory performance than NRs following BCCAO. Although no significant changes in the gross structure of myelinated white matter or oligodendrocyte number were noted, BCCAO resulted in subtle myelin degeneration and paranodal structural alterations at the nodes of Ranvier, regardless of hypertension. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) was predominantly observed in the white matter of SHRs following BCCAO, implying a role of hypertension in BBB dysfunction in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. In chronic cerebral ischemia, long-standing hypertension may aggravate impairment of BBB integrity, and the leaky BBB may in turn exacerbate dysfunction in the white matter leading to worsening of spatial cognitive performance. (C) 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available