4.5 Article

TGF-β1 IS CRITICAL FOR WALLERIAN DEGENERATION AFTER RAT SCIATIC NERVE INJURY

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 759-767

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.051

Keywords

Wallerian degeneration; Schwann cells; transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1); rat; nerve regeneration; signal pathway

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81370982]
  2. Key Program [81130080]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars, Ministry of Education of China
  4. Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, PAPD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wallerian degeneration (WD) is a process of axonal degeneration distal to the injury site followed by a robust regenerative response. It involves degeneration and regeneration which can be directly induced by nerve injury and activated by transcription factors. Although WD has been studied extensively, the precise mechanisms of transcription factors regulating WD are still elusive. In this study, we reported the effect of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) on WD after rat sciatic nerve injury. The data showed that TGF-beta 1 may express in injured rat sciatic nerve and cultured Schwann cells (SCs). Knock down of TGF-beta 1 expressions resulted in the reduction of SC proliferation and apoptosis, up regulation of cytokines and Smad2, 4. Enhanced expression of TGF-beta 1 could promote SC proliferation and apoptosis, down regulation of cytokines and Smad2, 4. Altered expressions of TGF-beta 1 may affect Smad and AKT but not c-Jun and extracellular regulated protein kinase (ERK) pathways. Our results revealed the role of TGF-beta 1 on WD and provided the basis for the molecular mechanisms of TGF-beta 1-regulated nerve degeneration and/or regeneration. (C) 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available