Journal
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages 4261-4280Publisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009JCLI2833.1
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NOAA
- U. S. Department of Energy
- Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTAC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A linear statistical downscaling technique is applied to the projection of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) climate change scenarios onto Hawaiian rainfall for the late twenty-first century. Hawaii's regional rainfall is largely controlled by the strength of the trade winds. During the winter months, disturbances in the westerlies can produce heavy rainfall throughout the islands. A diagnostic analysis of sea level pressure (SLP), near-surface winds, and rainfall measurements at 134 weather observing stations around the islands characterize the correlations between the circulation and rainfall during the nominal wet season (November-April) and dry season (May-October). A comparison of the base climate twentieth-century AR4 model simulations with reanalysis data for the period 1970-2000 is used to define objective selection criterion for the AR4 models. Six out of 21 available models were chosen for the statistical downscaling. These were chosen on the basis of their ability to more realistically simulate the modern large-scale circulation fields in the Hawaiian Islands region. For the AR4 A1B emission scenario, the six analyzed models show important changes in the wind fields around Hawaii by the late twenty-first century. Two models clearly indicate opposite signs in the anomalies. One model projects 20%-30% rainfall increase over the islands; the other model suggests a rainfall decrease of about 10%-20% during the wet season. It is concluded from the six-model ensemble that the most likely scenario for Hawaii is a 5%-10% reduction of the wet-season precipitation and a 5% increase during the dry season, as a result of changes in the wind field. The authors discuss the sources of uncertainties in the projected rainfall changes and consider future improvements of the statistical downscaling work and implications for dynamical downscaling methods.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available