4.7 Article

Predictive modelling for solar thermal energy systems: A comparison of support vector regression, random forest, extra trees and regression trees

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages 810-821

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.207

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Extra trees; Random forest; Decision trees; Ensemble algorithms; Solar thermal energy systems

Funding

  1. Horizon 2020 project PENTAGON Unlocking European grid local flexibility trough augmented energy conversion capabilities at district-level [731125]
  2. European Commission
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [731125] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictive analytics play an important role in the management of decentralised energy systems. Prediction models of uncontrolled variables (e.g., renewable energy sources generation, building energy consumption) are required to optimally manage electrical and thermal grids, making informed decisions and for fault detection and diagnosis. The paper presents a comprehensive study to compare tree-based ensemble machine learning models (random forest - RF and extra trees - ET), decision trees (DT) and support vector regression (SVR) to predict the useful hourly energy from a solar thermal collector system. The developed models were compared based on their generalisation ability (stability), accuracy and computational cost. It was found that RF and ET have comparable predictive power and are equally applicable for predicting useful solar thermal energy (USTE), with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 6.86 and 7.12 on the testing dataset, respectively. Amongst the studied algorithms, DT is the most computationally efficient method as it requires significantly less training time. However, it is less accurate (RMSE = 8.76) than RF and ET. The training time of SVR was 1287.80 ms, which was approximately three times higher than the ET training time. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available